Search Site
Menu
CAN FEDERAL DRUG REGULATIONS PREVENT INJURED CONSUMERS FROM FILING CLAIMS AGAINST GENERIC DRUG MANUFACTURERS?
On behalf of Rubin & Licatesi, P.C. posted in personal injury on Thursday, April 3, 2014.

Imagine following all directions when using a generic prescription medication and suffering severe burns and near blindness triggered by a hypersensitivity to the drug. How would it feel when your New York products liability attorneys inform you that you cannot pursue compensation for your injuries simply because federal regulations apply different standards to generic drugs than to branded drugs? Although New York has its own product liability laws, federal regulations can supersede them in cases like this one.

This is the case the U.S. Supreme Court will decide early in 2013 after a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with an injured patient, deciding federal law did not have a bearing on her claims and thus retaining a $21 million judgment against the manufacturer, according to The Wall Street Journal. However, the underlying issue pertains to federal requirements that generic drugs must match the design and labeling of their branded counterparts. This requirement makes it impossible for generic pharmaceutical manufacturers to make changes, even if those changes could improve safety for patients, which is why the manufacturer sought to retain the protections provided by a 2011 divided Supreme Court decision.

Does this mean patients have no recourse when they suffer injuries or illnesses from generic drugs? Although the Supreme Court has yet to decide this new case, individuals injured by dangerous pharmaceuticals should not give up without first seeking the advice of an experienced New York personal injury lawyer. Clearly one or more parties have liability for the injuries sustained by taking prescription medications. After hearing the details behind a claim, the job of the attorney involves seeking justice from all negligent parties.

After thoroughly assessing your claim, the legal team at Rubin & Licatesi, P.C. can identify all available legal options and present the advantages and disadvantages of each option so you can make an educated decision on how to progress with a claim.

Verdicts & Settlements

Over $100 Million in Verdicts & Settlements For Our Clients

  • $8 Million

    Plaintiff sustained a series of fractures and other injuries to the right shin, heel and foot, requiring nailing of the right tibia with two proximal and two distal locking bolts, ultimately resulting in below-the-knee amputation

  • $3 Million

    Infant plaintiff sustained encephalopathy as result of DPT vaccination administered by NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation.

  • $1.7 Million

    Plaintiff was involved in a car accident resulting in multiple disc herniations requiring percutaneous fluoroscopic-guided epidural treatment and lumbar fusion laminectomy.

  • $1.3 Million

    47 year old male police officer injured as a result of surgical malpractice by an orthopedic surgeon resulting in an inability to work and permanent impairment of gait.

  • $2 Million Dollar

    Wrongful death case settled at the Appellate level, 44-year-old husband and father drowned while swimming in a municipal pool.

Watch Our Videos
Meet Our Team
  • NYSTLA
    Nasaau County Bar Association
    NYSBA
    Queens County Bar Association
    ABA
  • ATLA
    Martindate Peer Review Rated
    Avvo Live Rating
    Avvo Live Reviews
    Avvo Clients Choice 2018
  • SuperLawyers
    US Union Network
    TNTL Top 100
    Top Attorneys NY Metro 2019
     
  • NYSTLA
  • Nasaau County Bar Association
  • NYSBA
  • Queens County Bar Association
  • ABA
  • ATLA
  • Martindate Peer Review Rated
  • Avvo Live Rating
  • Avvo Live Reviews
  • Avvo Clients Choice 2018
Contact us

Quick Contact Form