- posted: Sep. 04, 2015
- Personal Injury
Recently, The New York Post reported on the audacious defense filing in the Bob Simon wrongful death lawsuit, arising from the fatal limousine crash of February 11, 2015. Despite eyewitness accounts of the driver’s erratic maneuvers prior to crashing into fixed median barriers, Skyline Credit Ride claims in its Manhattan Supreme Court filing that Simon “assumed the risk” by riding in their Lincoln Town Car. The company goes on to assert that Simon “failed to use or misused available seat belts, and thereby contributed to the alleged injuries.”
As plaintiffs’ attorneys in car accident cases, we often face defendants who attempt to shift blame from themselves onto our clients. Assumption of risk and comparative negligence are two legal theories for doing just that, but they hardly seem appropriate in this case.
First, assumption of risk is a doctrine meant to protect activities in which risk of bodily injury is integral to the activity. Skydiving, football, horseback riding, water skiing: these recreational activities are always risky no matter how carefully the moderators plan for the participants’ safety. Unless public policy protects the activity, litigation could make them extinct. The same logic does not apply to riding in the back of a limo, where the major selling points are luxury and comfort.
Secondly, assumption of risk requires the defendant to prove that the plaintiff had sufficient knowledge of the risk to comprehend and appreciate the danger. Now, did the danger for Simon arise because he was in the back of a Lincoln Town Car on a Manhattan highway, or because he was in Skyline Credit Ride’s Town Car, driven by Abdul Reshad Fedahi, who The Post explains “had nine license suspensions and two speeding convictions on his record – and was driving with one hand because his right arm had been rendered useless due to a suicide attempt.” It would be hard for Skyline to argue that Mr. Simon had specific knowledge of the driving record, mental state and physical incapacity of the driver Skyline had assigned him.
As for comparative negligence, New York does allow a seat belt defense. If the defendant can prove through competent evidence that there is a causal connection between a plaintiff’s failure to wear a seat belt and the injuries he sustained, recovery for the injuries can be reduced. In other words, if the defense shows that Mr. Simon would not have been fatally injured if he had chosen to wear a seat belt, New York’s comparative fault law would come into effect.
If you have questions about your car accident, the knowledgeable attorneys at Licatesi Law Group, LLP are here to help. For answers to your questions on assumption or risk, comparative fault or any aspect of the law pertinent to your case, schedule a free consultation by calling us at 516-227-2662 or contacting our Brooklyn office online.
Related Posts: Illnesses or injuries could result from foods under recall, New York car accident results in multiple injuries, New York drivers may be affected by airbag accidents and injuries, New York hit-and-run leaves bicyclist with fatal injuriesShareBy Admin | Published September 4, 2015 | Posted in Personal Injury
Over One Billion in Verdicts, Settlements and Awards for Our Clients
- $899,940.10
69 year old female with underlying osteoporosis and preexisting spinal degeneration awarded as a result of a motor vehicle accident causing an acute T12 fracture of her spine.
- $8 Million
Plaintiff sustained a series of fractures and other injuries to the right shin, heel and foot, requiring nailing of the right tibia with two proximal and two distal locking bolts, ultimately resulting in below-the-knee amputation
- $3 Million
Infant plaintiff sustained encephalopathy as result of DPT vaccination administered by NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation.
- $1.7 Million
Plaintiff was involved in a car accident resulting in multiple disc herniations requiring percutaneous fluoroscopic-guided epidural treatment and lumbar fusion laminectomy.
- $1.3 Million
47 year old male police officer injured as a result of surgical malpractice by an orthopedic surgeon resulting in an inability to work and permanent impairment of gait.
- $2 Million Dollar
Wrongful death case settled at the Appellate level, 44-year-old husband and father drowned while swimming in a municipal pool.
- $899,940.10
69 year old female with underlying osteoporosis and preexisting spinal degeneration awarded as a result of a motor vehicle accident causing an acute T12 fracture of her spine.
- $8 Million
Plaintiff sustained a series of fractures and other injuries to the right shin, heel and foot, requiring nailing of the right tibia with two proximal and two distal locking bolts, ultimately resulting in below-the-knee amputation
Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Naila Amin Testimonial | Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Licatesi Law Group, LLP
James Grillo Testimonial | Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Licatesi Law Group, LLP
James Greiner Testimonial | Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Client Testimonial 1 | Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Client Testimonial 2 | Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Anna Manieri Testimonial | Licatesi Law Group, LLP
Our Office
423 RXR PlazaEast Tower
Uniondale, New York 11556516-227-2662 Phone
Free Consultation 24/7516-227-2662- ABOUT
- PRACTICE AREAS
- BLOG
- TESTIMONIALS
- CURRENT EVENTS
- REVIEWS & RATINGS
- CONTACT US
- MAPS & DIRECTIONS
Licatesi Law Group, LLP is located in Uniondale, NY and serves clients in and around Mineola, Carle Place, New Hyde Park, Franklin Square, West Hempstead, Woodbury, Uniondale, Floral Park, Westbury, Glen Oaks, Elmont, Malverne, Rockville Centre, Roosevelt, East Meadow, Bellerose, Valley Stream, Roslyn, Lynbrook, Baldwin, Little Neck, Queens Village, Nassau County, Queens County, The Bronx, Brooklyn, NYC, Westchester and Suffolk County.
Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. [ Site Map ]
See our profile at Lawyers.com or Martindale.com
Martindale-Hubbell and martindale.com are registered trademarks; AV, BV, AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are registered certification marks; Lawyers.com and the Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated Icon are service marks; and Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings are trademarks of MH Sub I, LLC, used under license. Other products and services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC. All rights reserved.
